Join On The Issues

Receive information and updates via email.

On You Tube

Visit On The Issues Magazine's YouTube Channel

Send us links to your favorite, progressive videos to add to our favorites

Featured Video:

Featured Video: Intimate Wars by Merle Hoffman
OTI Online
Beijing '95

The Appeal of Fundamentalism
by Frances Kissling


THE APPEAL OF FUNDAMENTALISM
The worldwide conservative drift -- in the U.S., the Islamic countries, Eastern Europe, Japan -- is an alarming trend. It has many manifestations, from very politicized fundamentalist movements to religious groups that counsel turning inward; from "back to the farm" survivalism to violent militias.


Fundamentalism responds to people's fear of the modern world, and there are some very good reasons to be afraid. We are experiencing economic downturns and loss of security on a worldwide scale. In the developing world in the 1960s, '70s, and even the '80s, there was a sense of hopefulness about economic progress that no longer exists today. In Western industrialized countries and in the former Communist bloc, social safety nets are being yanked away. And governments now have little credibility.

protesters with signsThis climate helps conservatism flourish. Conservation is not a bad word -- it depends on what we are trying to conserve. The problem is that the Roman Catholic Church and Islamic fundamentalists are trying to conserve patriarchy. They're finding an audience because when men face failure and humiliation in the public sphere, there's a desire to hold on to power at home.

Of course many women today also confront problems in the public sphere and want to come home and have their needs and desires respected and taken seriously. In socially generous times it's more possible to negotiate equality without serious loss to men. In times of scarcity and insecurity, the desire to hold on to power becomes stronger.

Feminists need to respond rapidly to the challenge of fundamentalism. First we need to understand and respect people's fears -- fears for our own security and for the world's. We need to acknowledge those worries and advocate strongly for equality and a rise in women's status, while being sympathetic to men's fears.

This does not mean trying to find a common ground with conservatism. We may not have any common ground. We do not want the same world they do and shouldn't blur the differences. Fundamentalism is the belief that your values are the ones that everyone must have. Conservatives are not looking for common ground -- they're looking to dominate state policy, to win. That's one of the reasons for their success.

We need to expose how the behavior of fundamentalists differs from their rhetoric, how they hurt people. For example, the Roman Catholic Church presented itself in Beijing as the protector of women, the primary server of health care and education to women. And to some extent it's true: They have provided a lot of service. But, for example, in Mexico the Catholic schools won't accept illegitimate children -- children of single or divorced mothers. Conservative systems are extremely punitive. Moreover, Catholic education was accomplished on the backs of women -- nuns who worked for almost no pay and, in the U.S., no social security.

We need to develop a clear agenda of what we stand FOR and put forward a positive, plural, tolerant, liberating vision of the future. When the right was out of power for a long time in the United States, they started dozens of think tanks where they honed in on, first, what they believed in, and, second, how to express it to persuade masses of people. This is something we should be doing now.

Women often rightly complain that we don't have time to sit back and think. Our visions tend to be very practical. We end up with a laundry list of problems, which is not something that captivates people's imagination. We believe we're a majority movement, but in fact we haven't yet found a way to mobilize large numbers of women. So along with getting out alerts on the latest abuses, we need the luxury of taking approaches that will not get immediate results -- such as analyzing the tactics and views of those we disagree with and taking the time to figure out how to get people on our side. I strongly disagree with the view that feminism is a relic of the past. But in the next decade we do need to understand social change and apply feminist values to the new, specific situations we face. We need to experience fluidity -- without a loss of core principles.

Go to Beijing '95: Special Report.

The Cafe

deepening the conversations by continually adding the insights of progressive writers.

Newest titles:

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

We’re now taking comments!

Enter the Cafe
The Cafe at On the Issues Magazine

CURRENT ISSUE
Winter 2012

Realities of The Waiting Room: Constantly Shifting by Lori Adelman

Anti-Abortion Harassment and Violence Still Stifle Access by Eleanor J. Bader

We're Not Sorry. Still. by Jennifer Baumgardner

The Poet's Eye From Poetry Co-Editor Sarah Browning

Calling Black LGBTQ Institutions: Where Are You? Where is Reproductive Justice? by Jasmine Burnett

Privacy at Stake: Patients, Clinics and Electronic Medical Records by Corinne A. Carey

Can We Choose Move Forward on Reproductive Justice? -- And How? by Ayesha Chatterjee and Judy Norsigian

"Love Means Second Chances": Reproductive Freedom in a Novel by Susan Elizabeth Davis

Satirist's View: Same Old Dilemma, or The Virgin Rebirth by Susie Day

As Access Slides, Feminists Need to "Extract" From Our Self-Help Past by Carol Downer

Abortion: On The Issues Magazine - by The Editors

How Anti-Abortion Protesters Got Me: Letter From a Young Activist by Sarah Flint Erdreich

The Grand Folly of Focusing on "Common Ground" by Gloria Feldt

Before "Roe": Legal Battles, Involuntary Servitude, My Mom by Justine Goodman

Next Generation Access: Medical Students Fill A Void by Mary Lou Greenberg

The Power of Theater: "Words of Choice" Touches Hearts by Alexis Greene

Where the Reality of Abortion Resides: Intimate Wars by Merle Hoffman

Gone Too Far? Reproductive Politics in the Time of Obama by Carole Joffe

Lila Rose: A Sweet Face to Accompany Extreme Anti-abortion Claims by Kathryn Joyce

Glorifying the Fetus While Ignoring the Fetal Environment by Margie Kelly

Reframing Compassionate Care: Of Madame Restell and Other Outlaws by Jeannie Ludlow

Helping Bloggers To Help: Tips for Reproductive Health Organizations by Amanda Marcotte

What To Do When They Say Holocaust by Carol Mason

"Silent Choices": African American Women Open Up on Film by Faith Pennick

Fine Thoughts On Fertilized Personhood by Marge Piercy

Heading Toward Menopause, Still Caring about Abortion by Andrea Plaid

Letter to a Young Activist: Don’t Drop the Banner by Barbara Santee

Redefining Chutzpah: More Bad Ideas to Burden Women by Aram A. Schvey

Sharing the Wealth of Knowledge on Abortion by Ria Sen and The Feminist Press

An Abortion Miracle? Let's Try the First Amendment by Priscilla Smith

Related Stories: Bold Discussions of ABORTION in On The Issues Magazine by The Editors

The Art Perspective: Ursula O'Farrell curated by Linda Stein

Student Think Tank

Winter 2012 Index

Print page      Bookmark site      Rss Feed RSS Feed

 

©1983-2012 On The Issues Magazine; No Reuse without permission. • Complete Table of ContentsPrivacyLinks of Feminist and Progressive Interest